I prefer past tense but I tend to write more in present. It's odd.

posted Feb 10, 2012

↓ back to reply

present

posted Feb 10, 2012

↓ back to reply

I prefer reading and writing things in the past because it's what I'm most used to.

posted Feb 11, 2012

↓ back to reply

So I've been writing a piece for submission to a magazine lately. It's very fun, and I'm feeling confident about it. But while I was nearing the end of the first major section of the piece, I noticed something odd: I was constantly tense switching. Now, in the realm of novels and in English writing in general, tense switching is a big no-no. It's typically an amateur mistake, and something that is unlearned with skill and time. I certainly thought I had unlearned it, so it struck me as odd that I would be making such an easy error throughout the entire piece.

But then I had a different thought: why am I tense switching? Well, the action of switching was certainly involuntary - I had no idea I was tense switching until I was practically through with the entire story. Involuntary actions are, in and of themselves, instinctual; my instincts, instincts I've honed to be very critical of writing, were for whatever reason telling me that switching tenses was a smart action.

Then a larger thought: how are most books written? I don't often pay attention to tense - I worry more about style and substance, and less about the fundamentals, because I don't mind sloppy writing as long as it's a story well told. Furthermore, as another thought, what do people enjoy reading? So I asked on various social networks, and decided to turn this into a little literary/sociological experiment. I posed the question "When reading a novel, especially a fiction novel, do you prefer it written in past or present tense?" in five different locations, and gathered responses. While responses accrued, I went to my bookshelf, and began noting all the tenses of the books I owned.
__________________

What did I find? Well, after a day of allowing people to answer the question, I got an array of responses.



The Responses
-------------
Pref for Present Tense - 4
Pref for Past Tense - 10
No Preference - 7
Total: 21

A clear lean to past by a strong majority, although what struck me most curious about these results were that such a strong standing of readers really didn't care. Those that fell into the No Preference category take a mix of responses, including: "I don't know / don't pay attention," "I don't care," or "both." This was curious, which is why I found it necessary to find corresponding data from my bookshelf. Whereas the original question was posed to readers, and what they like to read, checking my bookcase was asking writers what they tend to write.



The Bookcase:
--------------------
Novels in Present - 4
Novels in Past - 41
Total: 45
[books of a series were counted as a whole]

As we can see, a completely obscene majority. I stopped counting at 45 books, but glanced at the remainder of the novels I could find lying around for any written in past tense; there were none. Two things to note here! Firstly, it's clear that writers tend to write in the past tense. Why this is the obvious standard is unknown. Secondly, it is odd that so many respondents responded with both a preference for present, as well as no preference, when so few novels seem to cater to present-tense preferences.

Since there were so few novels in present tense, I decided to see which were those standing alone.



Novels written in Present Tense:
---------------------------
The Angel Riots by Ibi Kaslik*
The Hunger Games (series) by Suzanne Collins
High Fidelity by Nick Hornby
You Don't Know Me by David Klass
[* features switching tenses]



Novels that weren't Included in Study, also featuring Present Tense:
-----------------------------------------
Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger
Choke by Chuck Palahniuk
Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk
Rabbit, Run by John Updike

Very interesting! Note those included in the lists. All four that were in my study are extremely modern pieces. High Fidelity was written in 1995, whereas all the others are turn of the millennium. Furthermore, Ibi Kaslik didn't commit entirely to the present tense in The Angel Riots (she also wrote her previous book, Skinny, in past tense even though it also featured two protagonists and shifting perspective). I thought back to why I didn't notice tense shifting in the novel, and realized that it features two different characters and shifting perspectives; each perspective switch also features a tense shift, giving a very strong differentiation between the characters; you are offered a very different writing style for each character, accentuating the change of perspective.

The other novels I didn't own and were included are also highly modern, and I'd like to make a particular point to Mr. Palahniuk. I'm not well read on him; however it strikes me as curious that two of his novels, both which were turned into movies, were written in present tense. It also strikes me odd that he is vastly popular and praised for his style. Are his other novels featured in present as well? Does this understanding of the present tense help him out? Many writers describe present tense as "reading like a screenplay." How I feel about that statement is a different issue, but it is interesting that of those two lists, five of the books listed have been made into movies.

I did this whole thing for giggles, but it does raise some interesting questions about what we read and how we like it to be read, as well as how writers prefer to create. I can say this: when writing action scenes, past tense - while generally favoured - will always lose out, and I can assure that this is one of the distinct attributes to The Hunger Games success. Which tense is better is something I can't answer. But it was an interesting little thing to embark on.

posted Feb 12, 2012

↓ back to reply

That IS interesting! Glad it's not just me that likes to conduct little surveys to entertain myself! All my books are packed up at the moment so I can't check, but I've read a fair amount of Palahniuk & think they're all written in a similar style to Fight Club.

posted Feb 12, 2012

↓ back to reply

Earlier this week, I read Damned by Chuck Palahniuk. I didn't consciously realize it was written in present tense until just now when I checked. I would have thought I preferred novels written in past tense, but it appears that as long as I enjoy the story, the tense isn't as important.

posted Feb 12, 2012

↓ back to reply

Actually, Catcher in the Rye is written entirely in past tense. Salinger is a big fan of past tense. Franny and Zooey, as well as every short story in Nine Stories, are all written in past tense.

posted Feb 12, 2012

↓ back to reply

This is so interesting. I carry out little bits of research like this too.

posted Feb 12, 2012

↓ back to reply

I guess I would say I prefer the past tense if I had to choose one, but I liked The time traveller's wife and I loved the Fight club and they are both written in present tense.

Curiously enough, The time's traveller's wife is written in present tense and in first person, a combination I usually dislike. Actually, when I started to read The Hunger Games I found it very irritating and childish, but then The Hunger Games are not very well written (I like the story quite enough, though) so maybe that's the real point.

posted Feb 13, 2012

↓ back to reply

Upon thinking about this, it seems that most of my favourite novels were written in present tense....but I actually like it when an author is able to incorporate both present and past tense into their work.

The worst book eve written;, the bible, was written in past tense.

posted Feb 13, 2012

↓ back to reply

I'd say I prefer past, but that doesn't mean I won't like something written in present.

posted Feb 14, 2012

↓ back to reply

Well I like both; the past tense and present tense. I have read way too many books and I have had both of those almost equally as much.

posted Feb 15, 2012

↓ back to reply

I find that present is MUCH harder to do well. Couldn't really recall ever having liked it or any memorable instances of it, but then I read Wolf Hall by Hilary Mantel. Only a few flashback/dream-like passages are written in the past tense, the rest is present tense, and it works like a charm. Because the whole thing is just so fantastically written.

posted Mar 5, 2012

↓ back to reply

Since I did this little study thing, I actually got to writing. Decided to give it a go, try out present tense, make it work.

Didn't work. Got about two paragraphs before I had a headache. If I were more willing to take risks with this, and had more time to study present-tense books, I'd totally be willing. But I'm sticking with past for now. :P

posted Mar 7, 2012

↓ back to reply