Forum // SITE

Post looks that should be flagged! sticky

4,278 comments · save · last comment by Selina M. 21 hours ago

Jessy Jessydust.com

Jessy J.

TORONTO,
Canada

2230 posts

This thread is NOT to bash on people's looks but to link each other to looks that LEGITIMATELY broke one or more of the rules.

If people keep checking this thread and flagging, then we'll slowly get rid of all the photos that were poorly taken! :D


RULES OF THIS THREAD:
1. Don't agree with someone here? Don't flag.
2. Don't bash someone's look.
3. The looks you post have to be relatively new because this set of rules only came into effect a few months ago (I think). They don't apply to old looks. :)


The rules to posting can be found here or when you click flag on someone's photo.

over 4 years ago

#1354
Jazz Nicole

Jazz N.

NEW YORK,
United States

2653 posts

This thread should be stickied.

August 27, 2010

#1355
Gloria Manu

Gloria M.

ESSEX, ENGLAND,
United Kingdom

65 posts

LOLWUT?! some of these looks are ridiculous, the worst part is a girl in pyjamas and slippers with terrible flash glare in a mirror got more hype then me. FAIL

August 27, 2010

#1357
Randi  Butler

Randi B.

NEW YORK, NY,
United States

2402 posts

lookbook.nu/look/1009798-That-Boy-Is-A-Monster (?)

August 27, 2010

#1358
Jen O. Cide

Jen O. C.

VANCOUVER,
Canada

3612 posts

@Jazz N.

definitely.

August 27, 2010

#1359
Jen O. Cide

Jen O. C.

VANCOUVER,
Canada

3612 posts

also I kind of wish there were some kind of trigger for when people comment saying 'please check out my looks' that would auto-suspend the user's account. WORST

August 27, 2010

#1360
Aurora .

Aurora ..

ONTARIO,
Canada

3744 posts

@Jazz N.

done.

August 27, 2010

#1361
Jessy Jessydust.com

Jessy J.

TORONTO,
Canada

2230 posts

OMG when did the stickying start?!

August 27, 2010

#1362
Ellen Naughton

Ellen N.

MANILA/BRISBANE,
Philippines

120 posts

not full length:
lookbook.nu/look/1009398-And-we-take-the-bus-in-London

August 28, 2010

#1363
Lydia Jam

Lydia J.

ENGLAND,
United Kingdom

995 posts

lookbook.nu/look/1010834-Don-t-hide-your-face-because-he-is-guilty ?
What colour is her top?

lookbook.nu/look/1010306-Color-Me-Bad overedited

August 28, 2010

#1365
Aurora .

Aurora ..

ONTARIO,
Canada

3744 posts

with the changes to the new page there is barely anything on there

+ 3 pictures
lookbook.nu/look/1010916-My-first-look-I-hope-you-like-my-street-style

obstructed, not clearly visible, blurry, poor lighting, excessive editing, etc.
lookbook.nu/look/1009142-Dad-s-a-muggle-Mam-s-a-witch

not full body
lookbook.nu/look/1011654-black-and-gold

August 28, 2010

#1366
Barbro Andersen

Barbro A.

Norway

231 posts

Wow..

August 28, 2010

#1368
Aurora .

Aurora ..

ONTARIO,
Canada

3744 posts

+ 3 pictures
lookbook.nu/look/979851-Lets-bring-it-black-to-school

August 28, 2010

#1369
Jessy Jessydust.com

Jessy J.

TORONTO,
Canada

2230 posts

lookbook.nu/user/199455-Victoria-T
She has a repost

August 28, 2010

#1374
Chel .

Chel ..

TORONTO,
Canada

27 posts

Haha, seems like there is a fuckload of people who are flagged, funny cause some people on the hot page are not abiding by the "rules of lookbook!"

August 30, 2010

#1375
Taylor C K.

Taylor C K.

Canada

79 posts

@Jen O. C.

Okay so I am very sure that when you join the site and agree to the terms that it states that looks that are considered full body must be from your head to knees or your neck to feet. I am very sure of that. So my look lookbook.nu/look/1014420-And-it-goes-on-and-on-and-on should not be flagged. On the other hand I agree that my other look now you are free is not good quality.

August 30, 2010

#1376
Alice .

Alice ..

SUFFOLK,
United Kingdom

749 posts

lookbook.nu/look/1020528-My-picture-is-in-Grazia-UK
Repost

August 30, 2010

#1377
Alice .

Alice ..

SUFFOLK,
United Kingdom

749 posts

@Taylor C K.

can't see your knees, therefore she's right.

August 30, 2010

#1379
Jen O. Cide

Jen O. C.

VANCOUVER,
Canada

3612 posts

@Taylor C K.

The idea of the head-to-knees/neck-to-toe rule is to provide a clear view of what you're wearing. All we can see here is your jacket.

August 30, 2010

#1380
Amanda S

Amanda S.

SAN FRANCISCO,
United States

136 posts

lookbook.nu/look/1023292-One-of-these-things-are-not-like-thee-others
I can't see the outfit.

August 30, 2010

#1381
Maya O.

Maya O.

Finland

473 posts

A LOT of reposts from these 2 girls:

lookbook.nu/user/158207-Melanie-W

lookbook.nu/my_looks/108085-Juliana-G

August 31, 2010

#1383
Aurora .

Aurora ..

ONTARIO,
Canada

3744 posts

not full body
lookbook.nu/look/1020802-The-Devil-Wears-Zara

September 1, 2010

#1385
Amanda S

Amanda S.

SAN FRANCISCO,
United States

136 posts

lookbook.nu/look/1028682-I-left-my-heart-in-Tokio
Super Blurry and it's not a full body shot.

September 1, 2010

#1387
Amanda S

Amanda S.

SAN FRANCISCO,
United States

136 posts

Sorry

September 2, 2010

#1388
Kaycee L

Kaycee L.

AUSTRALIA,
Australia

23 posts

Nudity -
lookbook.nu/look/1032725-A-painting-rien-d-autre
More than 3 images -
lookbook.nu/look/1032651-Summer-Encore
lookbook.nu/look/1032409-Jasmin-Noir
lookbook.nu/look/1032385-Layer-me-on
More than one outfit/person -
lookbook.nu/look/1032627-Et-si-a-fait-mal-c-est-parce-qu-il-te-voit-pas
Not full body -
lookbook.nu/look/947073-empty-letters-born-again-nonsense

It's sad because some of these are such nice outfits, I just wish people could follow rules :(

September 2, 2010

#1394
Maya O.

Maya O.

Finland

473 posts

To Bombs:

Just for curiosity:
if there´s a rule(s) breaking look found and flagged that has been posted a while ago, like two weeks or a month etc, will that ever be deleted or will you guys let it stay cause it wasnt noticed and deleted right away when it was posted?
It would be kinda nice to know, so I wont waste my time flagging a bit older rules breaking looks. It just feels that the older looks I´ve flagged, never seems to be deleted.

September 3, 2010

#1398
Aurora .

Aurora ..

ONTARIO,
Canada

3744 posts

+ 3 pictures
lookbook.nu/look/1042499-Who-s-Next-in-Paris


+ 1 person/outfit
lookbook.nu/look/1039643-Bugs
lookbook.nu/look/1040163-black-and-white
lookbook.nu/look/824321-blue-horizon
lookbook.nu/look/1040755-sorry-girls-i-suck-d-ck
lookbook.nu/look/1042941-DOUBLE-TROUBLE


obstructed, not clearly visible, blurry, poor lighting, excessive editing, etc.
lookbook.nu/look/1040619-minnie
lookbook.nu/look/1042977-whimsy


not full body
lookbook.nu/look/1039195-Free-fallin
lookbook.nu/look/1039351-Don-t-you-ask-me-if-it-s-love-my-dear
lookbook.nu/look/1039577-will-this-get-deleted-because-me-head-isn-t-in-it
lookbook.nu/look/1039797-85-Degrees-and-Getting-Warmer
lookbook.nu/look/1040043-What-are-you-doing
lookbook.nu/look/1040261-Teenage-Dreams-In-A-Teenage-Circus
lookbook.nu/look/1040551-HELLO-AGAIN
lookbook.nu/look/1040671-Party-like-it-s-the-end-of-the-world
lookbook.nu/look/1040887-Paradise-Circus
lookbook.nu/look/1040623-WANTED
lookbook.nu/look/1041975-A-thousand-dollars
lookbook.nu/look/984817-That-s-a-secret-i-ll-never-tell
lookbook.nu/look/856125-She-is-gazing-at-me
lookbook.nu/look/1041605-YOU-AIN-T-HARDCORE-COS-YOU-SPIKE-YOUR-HAIR
lookbook.nu/look/1040915-simple
lookbook.nu/look/1043045-lonely-man
lookbook.nu/look/1017792-wayfarer-forever
lookbook.nu/look/1011374-two
lookbook.nu/look/1043081-Jeans-and-sea


lookbook.nu/look/1025770-I-M-JUST-LIKE-YOU-PART-2 is a repost of lookbook.nu/look/1020694-i-m-just-like-you

lookbook.nu/look/919995-morning-light-vintage-shirt is a repost of lookbook.nu/look/918093-golden-sunset

lookbook.nu/look/912107-NAME-YOUR-LOOK is a repost of lookbook.nu/look/909225-photographing

September 4, 2010

#1399
Jessy Jessydust.com

Jessy J.

TORONTO,
Canada

2230 posts

lookbook.nu/look/1043081-Jeans-and-sea

September 4, 2010

  

Accepted HTML tags: <a href="url">link</a> <img src="image url"/> <br/>

Saved Topics

You have no saved topics.

FORUM RULES

  • NO Duplicate or Repeat Posts
  • NO Off-topic Posts
  • NO SPAM or Unsolicited Advertising
  • NO Offensive or Harmful Content
  • NO Stolen or Copyright Infringing Content

Blog

Back to Top