Forum // SITE

Post looks that should be flagged! sticky

4,273 comments · save · last comment by Victoria B. 4 hours ago

Jessy Jessydust.com

Jessy J.

TORONTO,
Canada

2230 posts

This thread is NOT to bash on people's looks but to link each other to looks that LEGITIMATELY broke one or more of the rules.

If people keep checking this thread and flagging, then we'll slowly get rid of all the photos that were poorly taken! :D


RULES OF THIS THREAD:
1. Don't agree with someone here? Don't flag.
2. Don't bash someone's look.
3. The looks you post have to be relatively new because this set of rules only came into effect a few months ago (I think). They don't apply to old looks. :)


The rules to posting can be found here or when you click flag on someone's photo.

over 4 years ago

#4252
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4178 posts

lookbook.nu/user/3383019-Katrin-B/looks

10 days ago

#4253
Patricia C.

Patricia C.

SLOVAKIA,
Slovakia

66 posts

lookbook.nu/user/3092510-Perrie-E
photos of Perrie Edwards from Little Mix

9 days ago

#4255
Noctis △ Futuris

Noctis △.

A HIGHER DIMENSION,
Australia

2 posts

@Selina M.

Why was my look flagged? Does no-one on this site understand experimental design?

9 days ago

#4256
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4178 posts

@Noctis △.

far too over edited. see the second rule for that

9 days ago

#4257
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4178 posts

@Patricia C.

i saw her around but i never even recognised that the pictures were from someone in a band

9 days ago

#4258
Noctis △ Futuris

Noctis △.

A HIGHER DIMENSION,
Australia

2 posts

@Noctis △.

I understand the rules.

My clothing was not obstructed or unclear. If anything more emphasis was placed on the clothes.

Nevertheless, I will re-upload a less 'edited' version.

9 days ago

#4259
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4178 posts

@Noctis △.

the light was not enough to see the details of the clothes, the outlines were ok but the colours were far too saturated and clearly over edited

9 days ago

#4263
Jacqueline Stewart

Jacqueline S.

MELBOURNE,
Australia

37 posts

lookbook.nu/look/6052093- a beautiful pathway of rocks - insta style

lookbook.nu/look/6052061-Skull-Tank-Top - no person, just the top





8 days ago

#4266
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4178 posts

@Jacqueline S.

oh no, please don't encourage cats on here :D

6 days ago

#4269
Jacqueline Stewart

Jacqueline S.

MELBOURNE,
Australia

37 posts

I don't know what is funnier - the post lookbook.nu/look/6080075-L-P-T-Camera-Gi-M-S-T or the comments calling it hyped' and 'charming'

16 hours ago

#4270
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4178 posts

lookbook.nu/user/3405189-Misshu

lookbook.nu/user/3378959-Khongbiengioic06

spammers

10 hours ago

#4271
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4178 posts

@Jacqueline S.

before even looking at it, i know it's emel. she's a spambot

10 hours ago

#4272
Jacqueline Stewart

Jacqueline S.

MELBOURNE,
Australia

37 posts

@Selina M.

Yeh, wow. That kinda devalues the whole experience when people leave such spammy comments, but it just gets funny when they are commenting on what a 'nice look' a picture has and it isn't even a look. So, I guess the purpose of these spamming comments is it increases your karma? Is that why people do it?

5 hours ago

#4273
Victoria Burbulea

Victoria B.

CHISINAU,
Moldova

86 posts

@Jacqueline S.

ahaha I'm dying =))) what a crazy world.

How far can go the obsession of people for hypes,fans and hot page? :)

4 hours ago

  

Accepted HTML tags: <a href="url">link</a> <img src="image url"/> <br/>

Saved Topics

You have no saved topics.

FORUM RULES

  • NO Duplicate or Repeat Posts
  • NO Off-topic Posts
  • NO SPAM or Unsolicited Advertising
  • NO Offensive or Harmful Content
  • NO Stolen or Copyright Infringing Content

Blog

Back to Top