Forum // SITE

Post looks that should be flagged! sticky

4,288 comments · save · last comment by Selina M. 4 hours ago

Jessy Jessydust.com

Jessy J.

TORONTO,
Canada

2230 posts

This thread is NOT to bash on people's looks but to link each other to looks that LEGITIMATELY broke one or more of the rules.

If people keep checking this thread and flagging, then we'll slowly get rid of all the photos that were poorly taken! :D


RULES OF THIS THREAD:
1. Don't agree with someone here? Don't flag.
2. Don't bash someone's look.
3. The looks you post have to be relatively new because this set of rules only came into effect a few months ago (I think). They don't apply to old looks. :)


The rules to posting can be found here or when you click flag on someone's photo.

over 4 years ago

#4251
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

lookbook.nu/user/3383019-Katrin-B/looks

0 · 18 days ago

#4252
Patricia C.

Patricia C.

SLOVAKIA,
Slovakia

66 posts

lookbook.nu/user/3092510-Perrie-E
photos of Perrie Edwards from Little Mix

0 · 17 days ago

#4254
Noctis △ Futuris

Noctis △.

A HIGHER DIMENSION,
Australia

2 posts

@Selina M.

Why was my look flagged? Does no-one on this site understand experimental design?

0 · 17 days ago

#4255
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

@Noctis △.

far too over edited. see the second rule for that

0 · 17 days ago

#4256
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

@Patricia C.

i saw her around but i never even recognised that the pictures were from someone in a band

0 · 17 days ago

#4257
Noctis △ Futuris

Noctis △.

A HIGHER DIMENSION,
Australia

2 posts

@Noctis △.

I understand the rules.

My clothing was not obstructed or unclear. If anything more emphasis was placed on the clothes.

Nevertheless, I will re-upload a less 'edited' version.

0 · 17 days ago

#4258
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

@Noctis △.

the light was not enough to see the details of the clothes, the outlines were ok but the colours were far too saturated and clearly over edited

0 · 17 days ago

#4262
Jacqueline Stewart

Jacqueline S.

MELBOURNE,
Australia

38 posts

lookbook.nu/look/6052093- a beautiful pathway of rocks - insta style

lookbook.nu/look/6052061-Skull-Tank-Top - no person, just the top





0 · 16 days ago

#4265
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

@Jacqueline S.

oh no, please don't encourage cats on here :D

0 · 14 days ago

#4268
Jacqueline Stewart

Jacqueline S.

MELBOURNE,
Australia

38 posts

I don't know what is funnier - the post lookbook.nu/look/6080075-L-P-T-Camera-Gi-M-S-T or the comments calling it hyped' and 'charming'

0 · 9 days ago

#4270
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

@Jacqueline S.

before even looking at it, i know it's emel. she's a spambot

0 · 8 days ago

#4271
Jacqueline Stewart

Jacqueline S.

MELBOURNE,
Australia

38 posts

@Selina M.

Yeh, wow. That kinda devalues the whole experience when people leave such spammy comments, but it just gets funny when they are commenting on what a 'nice look' a picture has and it isn't even a look. So, I guess the purpose of these spamming comments is it increases your karma? Is that why people do it?

0 · 8 days ago

#4272
Victoria Burbulea

Victoria B.

CHISINAU,
Moldova

87 posts

@Jacqueline S.

ahaha I'm dying =))) what a crazy world.

How far can go the obsession of people for hypes,fans and hot page? :)

0 · 8 days ago

#4273
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

@Jacqueline S.

she's been discussed on here before a few times. it lowers the sincerity of the system and bumps up stupid posts like that which is incompletely unfair to everyone else. and you can tell it's automatic because she's not even looking at what she's hyping and commenting on. It's the same thing every time which gives it away. i'm not sure that it increases your karma though, but people do see you more

0 · 8 days ago

#4274
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

lookbook.nu/user/3383987-Asma-S/looks

lookbook.nu/user/3406127-Sarah-L/looks

why do people think that stealing pictures that aren't theirs is ok?

0 · 8 days ago

#4276
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

lookbook.nu/user/1498991-The-Difference-V

spammer

0 · 6 days ago

#4278
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

@Emily P.

he reposted it. what an idiot. some people just can't take a hint

0 · 4 days ago

#4280
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

lookbook.nu/user/3370241-Alina-G

spammer

0 · 4 days ago

#4281
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

lookbook.nu/user/215013-Suki-S

spammer

0 · 3 days ago

#4283
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

lookbook.nu/user/3380133-Linda-S/looks

a store

0 · 10 hours ago

#4285
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

@Divanda G.

so did you read what this topic is about? you want to be flagged for deletion?

0 · 7 hours ago

#4286
Divanda Gitadesiani

Divanda G.

JAKARTA,
Indonesia

23 posts

@Selina M.

I'm so sorry if I was wrong..
Thank you :)

0 · 6 hours ago

#4287
Selina M

Selina M.

LONDON,
United Kingdom

4244 posts

@Divanda G.

no problem, just read at the top what it's about first before you post. there's isn't a topic on here to post your looks, just so you know

0 · 6 hours ago

  

Accepted HTML tags: <a href="url">link</a> <img src="image url"/> <br/>

Saved Topics

You have no saved topics.

FORUM RULES

  • NO Duplicate or Repeat Posts
  • NO Off-topic Posts
  • NO SPAM or Unsolicited Advertising
  • NO Offensive or Harmful Content
  • NO Stolen or Copyright Infringing Content

Blog

Back to Top